- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 20:07:19 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, James Graham wrote: > > And boy does it suggest this feature will be a marketing problem :( > Darin Fisher blogged the Mozilla implementation[1] and received a stream > of comments, many from people who clearly haven't thought about how easy > tracking already is, to the effect that they will never use a browser > with this feature etc. It's hardly a representative sample of people > (since the more alarmed users are more likely to comment) but I can > easily imagine grossly unfair headlines like "Firefox 3 allows > advertisers to track you across the web", ignoring the fact that any > browser that implements HTTP redirects supports the same feature in a > much less transparent way. Actually, I was pleasantly surprised at the number of people who understood that this would help rather than hurt. I was expecting much more negative feedback. On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Alexey Feldgendler wrote: > > This would eventually lead to Mozilla and other browsers providing a > user-configurable option to ignore ping="", which in turn would make the > authors prefer the traditional (redirect-based) tracking because it's > not circumventable. JavaScript is circumventable yet these same authors use that today, so I don't think that's necessarily the case. On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Tyler Close wrote: > > I think the "ping" attribute is a great feature and I also think it's > great that the cited presentation of the feature provoked the reaction > that it did. Having a user base that expresses demand for privacy and > security is crucial to actually getting some privacy and security, which > is something I sorely want. Indeed! > The problem here is the presentation. In reality, the "ping" attribute > is a net plus for privacy and security, not a new threat. The feature > needs to be presented as something that will be applauded by "privacy > conscious folks", not something that will "raise some eye-brows". Yeah. I've changed the note in the spec, hopefully that will help. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 12:07:19 UTC