- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:20:48 -0500
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > Quoting Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net>: >> Hmm... Is <img> ever non-presentational? Radical thought: Deprecate >> <img>. > > A company logo? You could make an argument that trademarks have semantic value, but it's kinda weak, because you can identify the company by name as well. Here's some markup: | <h1 style="content: url(logo.png)">Company Name</h1> (Not sure I got the CSS right, but you get the idea.) > A picture of a new product some review is about? Much better example. That probably is semantic, yes. However, is there any situation where <object> couldn't be used instead of <img>?
Received on Saturday, 21 January 2006 04:20:48 UTC