- From: Eugene T.S. Wong <lists.eugenetswong@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:41:23 -0800
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:55:43 -0800, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au> wrote: > I'm confused. The subject of this thread you started is "Should ID be > required for <DFN>?", yet now when a suggestion requires the use of an > ID, you point out holes in it by trying to show that the required use of > an ID has problems. I don't know. I left my computer off for a few days, because I was getting steamed, plus I was getting distracted by other problems. Now that I have come back and taken a look, I honestly can't remember why I asked. I think that I was trying to be honest with the short comings of my own ideas. Since I was able to bounce the ideas off of you, I was able to get a clearer picture. I know that I've thought about this a lot, but I couldn't quite get a clear view of the problem. Now that we've discussed it, I think that I know and understand. -- Sincerely, and with thanks, Eugene T.S. Wong
Received on Monday, 16 January 2006 14:41:23 UTC