- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:20:05 +1100
Eugene T.S. Wong wrote: > I noticed that there is a <SMALL> element, but no <BIG> element. Is > there a specific reason for this? Both of them are quite presentational, but there is an attempt to redefine the small element with some semantic meaning. The same cannot be said for big, it is (and probably always will be) presentational, and therefore has no place in a semantic markup language. -- Lachlan Hunt http://lachy.id.au/
Received on Friday, 13 January 2006 14:20:05 UTC