- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:02:31 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > Is it the intent of WHAT WG to specify text/html parsing in such a way > that for each WHAT WG-conforming text/html document there exists (in the > mathematical sense) exactly one equivalent canonicalized (in the XML > c14n sense) XHTML document? That isn't a design goal, but off the top of my head I don't see any reason why this wouldn't be the case, except if you include comparing the result of the parsing the document with scripting enable vs disabled. > (Also, it would be cool to have a test suite of text/html docs and their > canonical XHTML equivalents.) Agreed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 24 February 2006 16:02:31 UTC