- From: Tim Altman <web@timaltman.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:34:20 +0100
On Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:48:57 +0100, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2006, Tim Altman wrote: >> >> May OBJECT and CANVAS be treated as empty elements, i.e. <canvas /> and >> <object /> if there is no fallback content? > > I don't understand your question. Let me rephrase: Is it valid for the object and canvas elements use the empty element syntax? > If you mean "Can the string '<object/>' be treated as an empty element > tag", the answer is no. You seem to have answered my question here. Why not? [...] >> Is fallback content required on OBJECT and CANVAS? > > Just like with <img alt="">, the lack of fallback content on either of > these would merely indicate that they were semantically neutral and not > conveying any extra information. For example: > > <h1>The foobar</h1> > <p>The foobar is a green circle.</p> > <p><object data="greencircle.png"></object></p> > > There is no fallback here because it would be redundant -- the image > paragraph is merely repeating the previous paragraph for emphasis in > visual media. Right. -- Tim Altman
Received on Wednesday, 15 February 2006 15:34:20 UTC