- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:55:50 +0200
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 17:14:18 +0200, Brad Fults <bfults at gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/5/06, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: <...> > > If this is anywhere in the near future, I'm all for dropping > getElementsByClassName() in favor of this broader solution. But if > this is high in the sky and won't be seen for years to come, I'll take > the former sooner. Everybody, of course, would favour the broader solution. Yet, as you stated, if getElementsBySelector() won't come soon, then getElementsByClassName() would be a welcomed addition. > What will it take to kick start the process for > getElementsBySelector()? I suppose a few browser implementations would > be good fuel. Yes, that would certainly be a good fuel, but it will take some time. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Monday, 6 February 2006 07:55:50 UTC