- From: dolphinling <dolphinling@myrealbox.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 21:08:42 -0500
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 5 Feb 2006, dolphinling wrote: > >>Actually, the javascript solution would be _superior_ to the XBL one in >>this case. The screenreader wouldn't pick up on the XBL at all, and >>would read the content as-is, likely confusing the user. > > > Um, there's no reason an aural browser couldn't support XBL. Hmm, I suppose not. Something still strikes me as making the javascript solution better, though. Perhaps it's a question of localized content vs. localized presentation of content. -- dolphinling <http://dolphinling.net/>
Received on Sunday, 5 February 2006 18:08:42 UTC