- From: Aankhen <aankhen@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 12:27:08 -0800
On 12/18/06, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis at googlemail.com> wrote: > I would however definitely suggest better messages, since "WARNING" > verges on being meaningless. Perhaps "HTML (corrupted)" and "XHTML > (corrupted)" for documents that cite (or imply) a standard document type > but clearly fail to conform to it, "text/html (non-standard variant)" > for text/html documents that do not cite (or imply) a standard document > type, and "XHTML (broken)" for non-well-formed XHTML. "I was gonna go to this site I found on Google, but then I saw that it was corrupted, so I figured it musta been a security issue or something." As for "text/html", it's just another string of technical jargon added by those crazy Google guys. Wonder what it means? Perhaps you feel I'm exaggerating; in that case, go and ask any non?computer savvy friends or relatives what it means if the HTML on a page is corrupted. -- Aankhen (We have no branches)
Received on Monday, 18 December 2006 12:27:08 UTC