- From: Dean Edwards <dean@edwards.name>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:45:52 +0000
James Graham wrote: > But this element would be purely for the purpose of interacting with CSS > so it does indeed seem to be a CSS issue. Not entirely. It also has some semantic value in that the element acts as a container for other elements that comprise a widget. Perhaps <reset> is the wrong name. I can't think of anything better though. Like I said, I don't like the name "widget" but it gives a better idea of what the element is. -dean
Received on Friday, 15 December 2006 09:45:52 UTC