- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:12:38 -0500
Bruce D'Arcus wrote: > In a world in which one CAN consider adding alternative > attributes (HTML 5, etc.), it makes no sense to me one would > simply say "no." [I'm cross posting to uf-discuss and whatwg because Bruce's comment was made on uf-discuss but I've made the same point on WHATWG.] Bruce, I agree with you completely. But Ian Hickson has said that AFAHK that there was no cry for additional attributes on the uf-discuss list, And Ian also said he saw no need for them after I requested to get several attributes added to the list of attributes applicable to all elements, i.e. abbr, href, name, rel, rev, scope, size, src, type, and value. I hadn't had the chance to ask the uf-discuss list about this, so now is a perfect time. What about adding additional standard attributes to all elements. Would it be helpful? -- -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
Received on Monday, 11 December 2006 20:12:38 UTC