- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2006 14:33:59 +0600
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 22:42:06 +0600, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: >>> I mean that the feed might contain items that were never part of the page >>> linking to the feed. For example, this page: >>> >>> <!DOCTYPE HTML> >>> <title>Feeds for this site</title> >>> <link rel=feed href=status.xml> >>> <link rel=feed href=news.xml> >>> <link rel=feed href=links.xml> >>> <p>This page links to the three feeds for this site. >>> >>> There are no items on that page, but it links to three feeds that the site >>> provides. >> In your example, what's the relation between status.xml and this page? > status.xml is just a resource that provides a syndication feed. It is not > necessarily associated with a particular Web page. If there is no particular relation, then it should not be <link>. The <link> element is for resources which are in specific typical relations to the current document. I would mark it up like this: <h1>Feeds for this site</h1> <ul> <li><a href="status.xml" type="application/atom+xml">Status feed</a></li> <li><a href="news.xml" type="application/atom+xml">News feed</a></li> <li><a href="links.xml" type="application/atom+xml">Links feed</a></li> </ul> Note the absence of rel attribute on the <a>: there is no specific typical relation between the current document and the referenced resources. -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Thursday, 7 December 2006 00:33:59 UTC