- From: Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 18:09:44 -0500
Alexey Feldgendler wrote: >> An interesting idea, but I don't see how Google would benefit from this. 1.) If the web get cleaner, it's easier for search engines to inspect documents 2.) If Google doesn't benefit from a better web, why would they pay Ian to edit the HTML5 spec? >> On the other hand, it requires effort, Everything worth doing requires effort. >> and it would set Google somewhat at war with owners of numerous corporate websites whose image would be spoiled. Google is already at war with everyone who is not #1 in a search engine result and wants to be. What I proposed would be totally objective -- it use a standards validator -- and the corporations with websites would be totally in control to fix any problems found with their not following standards. Google would see no fallout from this that would affect them negatively; instead they'd become a hero to some people that are very difficult to please. And if these corporations were using content management systems that didn't produce standards-based code, you can bet those CMS vendors would soon have a new #1 priority, but fast. And THAT would clean up the web quicker than any academic or grass roots effort ever could. Anyway, it's always easy to say something won't work, especially if when no alternate proposals are presented. -Mike Schinkel http://www.mikeschinkel.com/blogs/ http://www.welldesignedurls.org/
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 15:09:44 UTC