- From: Robert Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 13:36:43 -0500
On 12/6/06, Sam Ruby <rubys at intertwingly.net> wrote: > > How was it fixed? It was fixed in a way that covers mis-sniffed feed content specifically. That is, content that was sniffed as a feed but isn't one, like that Atom template or some FOAF files, are displayed correctly. These are edge cases. > Both so that Ian's eventual text can be consistent > with the fix, and for my edification as I would love to be able to > directly view my test cases again: Your test cases are a different bug: "correctly" sniffed feeds that you don't want sniffed. Unfortunately, I can't agree that the MIME type "text/plain" carries as strong a message as it used to. It would be possible to turn off sniffing for some 'text/plain' values if there were a better indicator available. For example, by using a new Content-Disposition value (web compatible because unknown values are treated as 'inline'). -- Robert Sayre
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 10:36:43 UTC