[whatwg] Content Model Restrictions on table>tr in HTML

On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Simon Pieters wrote:
> 
> From: Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch>
> > > A missing </option> implies non-conformance but no parse error per 9.1
> > > and 9.2 respectively.
> > 
> > <option> and other form controls aren't yet really part of the
> > specification, and are missing all over the place. I added these to the
> > syntax section for you, [...]
> 
> FWIW... </option> may also be omitted if the next sibling is an optgroup 
> element.

Hm. Actually an <optgroup> start tag has to imply an </optgroup> end tag 
for compatibility with browsers... spec fixed.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'