- From: Alexey Feldgendler <alexey@feldgendler.ru>
- Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:41:43 +0600
On Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:37:34 +0600, Anne van Kesteren <annevk at opera.com> wrote: >>>> http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#elements lists the >>>> elements which are considered void. The <command> and <event-source> >>>> also have empty content model, so shouldn't they end up there as well? >>> That's in fact mentioned in the source code. >> Is there a reason why they are commented out? > Looking at the current list it seems that those are the only two that > haven't been "well defined" in the draft yet. (<input> is defined in Web > Forms 2.) At least <command> has an "official" definition like other elements. -- Alexey Feldgendler <alexey at feldgendler.ru> [ICQ: 115226275] http://feldgendler.livejournal.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 December 2006 00:41:43 UTC