- From: Michel Fortin <michel.fortin@michelf.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 18:56:00 -0500
Le 5 d?c. 2006 ? 17:03, Ian Hickson a ?crit : > The "one target" now is HTML5. I wonder about one thing though. If the recommended serialization is HTML5, why is there new features which are simply not supported by HTML5 (list inside paragraphs, nested forms, etc.)? My impression is that while HTML is recommended in the prose, the new features are implicitly recommending XHTML. Recommending using the HTML format while making XHTML more powerful at the same time just strike me as incoherent. This makes it look like XHTML is the future and that HTML is a temporary and limited recommendation to keep backward compatibility. That's what I understand while reading the spec as a whole. If that's not what is intended, then maybe something should be done about that, like removing some of the incompatible features. Michel Fortin michel.fortin at michelf.com http://www.michelf.com/
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 15:56:00 UTC