- From: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:08:18 +0000
Mike Schinkel wrote: > > All really sucessful text formats have been easy to edit (why did > RSS take off while RDF is still struggling to get off the ground?) > I don't necessarily disagree with your sentiment, but it could be argued that RSS has done well while RDF has floundered largely because RSS solves a real-world problem (how to get news/weblog content into aggregators) while RDF solves a purely theoretical problem that less people have a pressing need to solve (A generic representation of relationships between resources).
Received on Tuesday, 5 December 2006 11:08:18 UTC