- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 20:30:42 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, James M Snell wrote: > > You're right that the differentiation in the content-type is of less > importance but without it there's no way for me to unambiguously > indicate that a resource has both an Atom Feed representation and an > Atom Entry representation. Assuming that an "atom feed" is a feed, and an "atom entry" is an alternative format representation of the same document: <link rel=feed href=feed.xml> <link rel=alternate href=entry.xml> ...does what you are asking for according to HTML5, as does: <link rel=alternate href=feed.xml type=application/atom+xml> <link rel=alternate href=entry.xml> If an "entry" is something more special (e.g. if it is actually an edit interface), then register a new rel="" value for it, e.g. rel=edit: <link rel=feed href=feed.xml> <link rel=edit href=entry.xml> -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 12:30:42 UTC