- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 16:44:39 +0000 (UTC)
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Michel Fortin wrote: > > Okay, so if I understand well, xml:lang in the spec refers to the "lang" > attribute in the "xml" namespace, not to the "xml:lang" attribute in the > null namespace that you get with the HTML parser. It makes sense from a > DOM perspective, but it's misleading from a markup perspective, so I > still think it should be clarified. Could you propose some text? > And although it's less confusing, I think the same should be clarified > about xml:id: it's the "id" attribute in the "xml" namespace, not the > "xml:id" attribute in the null namespace that you get with the HTML > parser. I don't see any reason to mention XML ID in the Web Apps spec. It's a different spec. We're a big enough spec as it is without explaining all the other specs out there, especially those we don't even interact with. :-) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 08:44:39 UTC