- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 09:09:31 +0000
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 00:15 -0800, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > Probably solution could be in creation of "Open HTML/CSS/Script > specification" that will make conditions for competition of various > approaches/technologies. Who knows? I doubt it. HTML persists as a mainstream format because Internet Explorer cannot handle application/xhtml+xml. I predict that will change in IE8. There are other old-style SGML-based languages, but I haven't seen much use of them on the web, which isn't surprising as browsers aren't really SGML readers. And adding existing XML-based languages to the text/html world is tricky (see the problems with MathML and HTML5). There are now a /lot/ of XML-based languages. Many of these have not made into mainstream browsers yet, like TEI and DocBook. But as browser support for XML improves, any challenger is likely to be up against XHTML 2 or Web Applications 1.0, not HTML. HTML is a small world of legacy serialization; XML is a big world of possibility, if for no other reason than it's easy to create new XML languages. In practice, competition between such languages will only work if we develop ways of dealing with differing levels of browser support. And that means either describing one language in terms of another, or serving different serializations of the same content. Anything else would be an accessibility nightmare. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 01:09:31 UTC