- From: Martin Atkins <mart@degeneration.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:46:23 +0000
Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > | > > | > <p.myclass>...</p> is equivalent of > | > <p class="myclass">...</p> > | > > | > | HTML5 is meant to be backwards compatible, so this is out of the question. > > And where do you see problems with backward compatibility? > Or let's put this way: what would be a definition of backward compatibility in > terms of HTML5? > Anything specified in HTML5 must degrade gracefully in pre-HTML5 software. Unless at the very least current browsers parse <p.myclass> as <p> this proposal is unworkable under this constraint.
Received on Friday, 1 December 2006 00:46:23 UTC