- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:16:14 +0100
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > About right except there is a mechanism in the W3C work for adding new > values, which don't make it non-conforming. Given that people are pretty > inventive, I think that is quite valuable. YMMV I don't see the point; if someone makes a value up and UAs don't support it then it is worthless, if UAs do support it then it should become part of the next HTML spec. I can't imagine how auto-discovery of new widget types would work (maybe I should read the RDF Taxonomy spec but I can't stomach it), and I can't think of any similar auto-discovery technology that is widely by authors. I guess allowing a predefined list of values and vendor extensions like role="ms-ribbon" might be a suitable compromise between innovation and ease of use. > And it can appear on any element, although there is not much point > adding it to things that use well-defined semantics already. Indeed. -- "Eternity's a terrible thought. I mean, where's it all going to end?" -- Tom Stoppard, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead
Received on Thursday, 24 August 2006 11:16:14 UTC