- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 21:25:40 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, mozer wrote: > > A lot of work as already been done by the W3C XSL WG on calendar (and > even negative year in needed) > > http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#lang-cal-country Wow, that section has more UA-dependent behaviour than the HTML4 spec does. And it fails to actually define anything as far as I can tell. In fact it seems less precise than even WF2 at this point. It doesn't even mention leap seconds at all. On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > > > > > I don't think we need to support years before 1CE. > ... > > > Anybody doing real work with dates that far back is going to have very > > > specific needs when it comes to calendars and WF2 isn't going to cut it > > > for them. > > I disagree. There are a lot of use cases for simple forms dealing with > dates before 0001-01-01 even if we just use the proleptic Gregorian > calendar. The most obvious is a conversion widget between calendars - > there is no need for machine-interpretable information to know that one > date is julian and one gregorian to find the right dates for tracking > key events leading to the October Revolution... Um, ok. Maybe in Web Forms 3. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 16 August 2006 14:25:40 UTC