- From: James Graham <jg307@cam.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 11:48:49 +0100
Matthew Raymond wrote: > Aaron Leventhal wrote: >> Firefox has support for making dynamic web applications with custom JS >> widgets accessible, via support for xhtml:role and aaa: properties. If >> anyone would be interested in taking a look, I would welcome feedback. > > What Firefox is doing for DHTML accessibility has a very narrow use > case. It applies to DHTML widgets, that are not bound to fallback markup > using XBL Without commenting (yet!) on the rest of this thread, I should just note that any argument that relies on the near-future widespread deployment of XBL is unconvincing. I would be extremely surprised if the entire XBL spec is easier to implement than some targeted extensions to HTML, therefore we shouldn't use it as a justification any more than any other unlikely to be implemented soon technology. , where a proper CSS presentation for the users primary media > is not available This is almost always the case on the real web. > I don't see a significant difference between |role| and predefined > values for |class|. Oh and I'm allergic to predefined class values :)
Received on Saturday, 12 August 2006 03:48:49 UTC