W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2006

[whatwg] The embed element

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 14:44:40 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0604261443260.21459@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> Quoting Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch>:
> > Basically I envisage having <embed> being for plugins, <img> being for
> > bitmap images, and <iframe> being for nested browser views, with <object>
> > being an element that autodetects whether to use a plugin, display a
> > bitmap image, or act as a nested browser view based on the content. (For
> > historical reasons, of course, the elements don't exactly fit this mold,
> > but it's close enough IMHO.)
> I think having <embed> only for plugins doesn't scale. It also doesn't 
> reflect implementations as they have to support it for SVG for example 
> which some support natively.

Right, as I said, for historical reasons the elements don't exactly match 
that. However the basic principle is as I described; the exceptions are 
all "logical" extensions to that (e.g. "plugins" can be browser-native).

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 07:44:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:46 UTC