- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:53:08 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > How is one supposed to extract conformance requirements from the hCard > and hCalendar specs? The section that defines the format in both specs > is rather short. Is it an obvious bijective mapping between > hCalendar/iCalendar and hCard/vCard for those who are familiar with the > iCalendar and vCard formats? (It isn't obvious to me.) The existence of > http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-parsing suggests that the specs > themselves are not sufficient descriptions of the formats and their > processing. > > Are there even any conformance requirements for these formats? (The > specs seem to encourage view source instead of pointing to conformance > criteria.) These questions would be better forwarded to the microformats.org mailing lists. The WHATWG spec won't make the <card> and <calendar> elements use hCard and hCalendar until/unless the relevant specs are much clearer about the points you raise. > Also, an example in the Web Apps 1.0 spec suggests that the <card> > element does not replace the class='vcard' root of the card. It would be > nice to be explicit about this in the prose. (Why is the content model > then any block level elements instead of exactly one block level element > or zero or one block level elements?) The <card> and <calendar> sections in the WA1 spec right now are nothing but placeholders (hence the "TBW" marker on the section headers). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 15 April 2006 02:53:08 UTC