- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:02:18 +0300
On Apr 7, 2006, at 00:11, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Section 3.4. > > "The repeat-min attribute specifies the number of repetition blocks > that the remove button type will ensure are present each time a > block is removed. Its value must be a positive integer (one or more > digits 0-9 interpreted as a base ten number). If the attribute is > omitted or if it has an invalid value then it is treated as if its > value was zero." > > Is zero intentionally excluded from the permissible values? > Wouldn't it be more natural to spec the integer to be non-negative? I hit the counterpart issue with repeat-max at: http://webforms2.testsuite.org/repetition/attributes/repeat-max/001.htm The test case is wrong according to the current working draft, because the value of repeat-max is '0' in the test case and only positive integers are allowed values (and other values are ignored). Even though repeat-max='0' does not make sense if the value permanently forbids repetition, wouldn't it make sense to allow non- negative integers so that repetition could be dynamically forbidden or allowed by changing the attribute value? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen at iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 7 April 2006 04:02:18 UTC