W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > April 2006

[whatwg] id and xml:id

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:35:08 -0400
Message-ID: <4432A03C.3070608@inkedblade.net>
Henri Sivonen wrote:
> I have now assessed the damage. It is not as bad as it looked like. :-)
> Despite a flood of error messages, there were only three causes:
> 1) Can't have wild card attributes on wild card elements in the wild  
> card content models of the script and style elements. (Not a big  deal. 
> It is reasonable to restrict them to known style and script  languages.)

That seems odd. You should be able to say "the content model of this element
is anything".

> 2) Jing complains about the IDREFness altering co-occurrence  constraint 
> between valuetype and value on the param element.
> 3) It appears that in RELAX NG an attribute can't be allowed to take  
> the empty string if the attribute has the IDREFS nature. This is a  
> problem with the form attribute.
> See: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rng-users/message/422

Does moving the choice up higher help any?

Received on Tuesday, 4 April 2006 09:35:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:46 UTC