[whatwg] [WF2] Readonly and default pseudoclass matching

On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Matthew Raymond wrote:
> > 
> > Disabled is already done. "readonly" I'm less sure about, but I have 
> > added it to the list of things to consider for WF3.
> 
>    It's possible that a group of fields could be read-only, especially 
> if you don't have security access to change them, so this does need to 
> be considered.

Yup. It's on the list for WF3.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Sunday, 4 September 2005 09:55:29 UTC