- From: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2005 12:28:18 +0200
Quoting Henri Sivonen <hsivonen at iki.fi>: > I think the latter approach should be chosen, because otherwise it > would be impossible to extend HTML in the future with an element that > can occur as a child of 'p'. It would also not be compatible with the current web. So that would not be an option at all. > How should this list be augmented for HTML5? Eg. should a start tag > for <section> close a paragraph? I do not think that would be a good idea. Changing the HTML parser is not something browser vendors tend to like. I think HTML5 should just require end tags in certain circumstances. Or perhaps just require them for some elements, like the P element. > Should (in memory of HTML 4.01 Transitional) character data imply the > start of body? It should be non conforming, but it should be parsed that way. (Both are should for readability.) Kind regards, Anne -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/>
Received on Sunday, 4 September 2005 03:28:18 UTC