- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:53:43 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 31 Oct 2005, Lachlan Hunt wrote:
> > >
> > > For XML documents not all elements are ignored. Elements with known
> > > semantics are parsed.
> >
> > This is correct. What says otherwise?
>
> The current web-apps draft:
>
> | For styling languages that consist of pure text, user agents must use
> | a concatenation of the contents of all the text nodes and CDATA nodes
> | that are direct children of the style element (ignoring any other
> | nodes such as comments or elements), in tree order.
>
> That definition is unclear in the case of:
> http://annevankesteren.nl/test/xml/xhtml/style-element/005
>
> <style>
> p { background:red }
> <style> p { background:lime } </style>
> </style>
>
> It says the content of nested elements should be ignored; but since it is a
> style element itself, it's not being ignored by Mozilla.
Oh, I see the confusion. The parenthetical is being interpreted way too
literally. Ok, fixed.
--
Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2005 16:53:43 UTC