- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:37:12 +0300
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 22:13:08 +0300, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, ROBO Design wrote: <...> > > Yes. (Note that the </html> tag is optional, but its absence is an > artefact of the tools I use to generate the spec). > > <...> > > Right, the WF2 spec contains the WF3 wishlist at the end, and the WA1 > spec > contains notes all over the place. > > <...> > > Why not? People have found the WF3 notes useful. I agree they shouldn't > be > visible, but what's wrong with having them as comments? It is interesting ... but ... 'weird' to me at least :). <...> > > I might provide a split version in due course but it would be a lot of > work so I'm not planning on doing it any time soon. I'd rather cut > features out, to be honest. > A split version would be good, but only for final. I know it takes time and work, that's why only for final. <...> > > As others have indicated, there's a spec for that language code. :-) But > it's mostly for fun. > I believed so, but that 'spec' of the language code is not really a spec, it's more of a 'serious joke' :). Some guys 'defended' the use of en-GB-hixie, like it's something usual :). Thanks for clearing it out: mostly for fun. -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2005 03:37:12 UTC