W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > November 2005

[whatwg] WA 1.0 and WF 2

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:39:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0511142338150.9929@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Jasper Bryant-Greene wrote:

> On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 19:14 +0000, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Simon Pieters wrote:
> > > 
> > > I would prefer if the spec was gzipped
> > 
> > In theory this should be happening already. The server supports gzip 
> > [content] encoding.
> 
> Firefox 1.0.7 LiveHTTPHeaders would indicate to the contrary -- Firefox 
> is sending an Accept-Encoding header, but the response doesn't seem to 
> be gzip encoded. The Server line shows mod_gzip in the extensions, but 
> for some reason it isn't gzipping the spec.

I tried to work out why this was happening over the weekend, and failed. 
It seems the only things that are getting gzip-encoded are the return 
values of scripts. If anyone has any experience getting mod_gzip to work, 
and they would like to help with this, please contact me off-list.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 15:39:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:43 UTC