- From: ROBO Design <robodesign@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 12:50:51 +0200
On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 01:30:41 +0200, Mike Dierken <mdierken at hotmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 00:26:33 +0200, Dimitri Glazkov > <dimitri.glazkov at gmail.com> wrote: > >> As for the "tags" attribute discussion, you guys just invented a >> "class" attribute. > > Well, that also was one suggestion, but 'class' is mostly for user > interface > rendering, rather than purely semantic meaning. But it may not be > necessary > or workable to have a 'purely semantic' attribute. Some web crawling > system > would likely be able to figure out the semantic equivalence if enough > people > used a small enough set of values for similar things. Dimitri is right. We did so, but with the purpose of defining semantic meaning, instead of user interface elements. Yet, I have to add that what we've suggested is (almost) useless. That's because the WA 1.0 specification already contains something that can solve what we wanted: profiles [1]. [1] http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#profile -- http://www.robodesign.ro ROBO Design - We bring you the future
Received on Monday, 7 November 2005 02:50:51 UTC