[whatwg] rel/rev for <form> ?

• From: Dimitri Glazkov <dimitri.glazkov@gmail.com>
• Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:26:33 -0600
• Message-ID: <fb15ac210511061426t2af7b48al839585f02e85eed2@mail.gmail.com>

Ok, here's my take:

Having rel/rev for a form element is logical. Hyperlink and form are
inherently related in that both are used to specify protocol of
communication. So, if hyperlink can have rel/rev, why not form?

As for the "tags" attribute discussion, you guys just invented a
"class" attribute.

:DG<

Received on Sunday, 6 November 2005 14:26:33 UTC