- From: Charles Iliya Krempeaux <supercanadian@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:17:27 -0800
Hello, On 11/4/05, ROBO Design <robodesign at gmail.com> wrote: [...] > Well ... creative uses ... might be there for just about almost any tag > with a rel= attribute. > > Still not convinced :). Let me ask you some questions. (Your answers will help me know how to explain things better.) * Do you see that "rel" and "rev" based formats have important uses beyond just keyboard shortcuts? * Do you think that semantics embedded into HTML is important? * Do you think being able to provide semantics between 2 resources -- between 2 URI's -- is important? * Do you think that web crawler usage or "rel" and "rev" based formats is important? * Do you think that user script usage or "rel" and "rev" based formats is important? * Do you think that extension usage or "rel" and "rev" based formats is important? * Do you think that be able to use other HTTP methods, other than GET, is important? * Do you think that being able to attach semantics to resources -- to URI's -- accessed through HTTP methods, other than GET, is important? * Do you think that being able to parameterize a "request" is important? (One thing though. Re-reading my message over, it seems to kind of have a "rude" connotation. But please note that is not my intent.) See ya -- Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc. charles @ reptile.ca supercanadian @ gmail.com developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/ ___________________________________________________________________________ Never forget where you came from
Received on Friday, 4 November 2005 14:17:27 UTC