[whatwg] Re: About XHTML 2.0

Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> Perhaps <gap/> would work?
>> 
>> Dropping [<hr/>] would work too. I still haven't seen any use cases
>> that require this particular empty construct.
> 
> Actually Steven Pemberton gave some interesting examples of what look
> to me like valid use cases for <hr/> in a recent talk of his. Search
> for <hr> in these slides:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/Talks/04-19-steven-XHTML2-XForms/
> 
> I don't really see what else to use for those.

Why doens't SECTION suffice? They are sections separated by decoration.
At least, that is how it appeals to me.


-- 
  Anne van Kesteren
  <http://annevankesteren.nl/>

Received on Saturday, 21 May 2005 06:25:33 UTC