- From: Michael Gratton <michael@quuxo.com>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 00:12:04 +0930
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 16:47 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > Of the various server-side frameworks available Java servlets are among > the most cluefully designed when it comes to getting HTTP right. If a > developer calls doPost from doGet, there is nothing the framework > designer can do about it. True. I am not bashing the Servlet API, I am just pointing out common practise. The Struts framework, for example, is a very popular Java framework built on the Servlet API but it calls the same processing method for both GETs and POSTs. Very poor form. Also, I think that because it uses same API to access parameters specified by both GET and POST requests it tends to encourage this sort of behaviour. But this is probably OT. > I'm still -1 on changing the specs to accommodate people who have been > ignoring RFC 2616. Ditto. > Usually the people who > don't respect the idempotency of GETs also have crufty URLs with query > strings so that a robot can apply heuristics to avoid query strings. Which of course might punish sites (or users of sites) that have valid uses for query strings. /Mike. -- Michael Gratton, Software Architect. Quuxo Software <http://web.quuxo.com/> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20050514/2e3c010a/attachment.pgp>
Received on Friday, 13 May 2005 07:42:04 UTC