W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > May 2005

[whatwg] [WA1] Literals and Actions, comments on inline markup

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 00:14:23 -0400
Message-ID: <4282D81F.70900@inkedblade.net>
fantasai wrote:
> 
> Strength (<strong>)
> -------------------
> 
>   Subtle change from HTML4 semantics, and I think I approve. The example,
>   again, is excellent.
> 
>   The contrast between
>     # Changing the importance of a piece of text with the strong element
>     # does not change the meaning of the sentence.
>   and
>     # The placement of emphasis changes the meaning of the sentence.
>   is brilliant.

Figured out what was bothering me about the first sentence.

   # The strong element represents strong importance for its contents.

Change "strong importance" to "importance stress". This also puts it
in parallel with "emphatic stress".

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 21:14:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:41 UTC