- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 01:52:01 -0400
Phil Ringnalda wrote: > > Arve Bersvendsen wrote: > >> On Tue, 03 May 2005 18:52:59 +0200, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray at Sun.COM> wrote: >> >>> http://diveintomark.org/rfc/draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.txt > >> 1) Change the attribute value for the rel from "alternate" to "feed", > > Don't forget, since you would be doing that primarily for people who > think too much, that you'll also need to include a profile [1] URI and > make a guess at what dereferencing that URI ought to return, and > probably take a stab at explaining how to deal with multiple profiles, > since the HTML spec punted on that. This would not be necessary if 'feed' were added to the HTML standard directly. > Popularizing "feed" would have one benefit outside Atom's scope, though: > there's currently no useful way for an RSS 1.0 feed to do autodiscovery > with type="application/rdf+xml" since it could be any alternate RDF, not > just RSS: if Atom breaks the ice with "feed" then RSS 1.0 wins. 'feed' is not really defining a /relation/, it's defining a sort of meta-content-type... But I would much prefer that to forcing 'alternate' on non-'alternate' links. ~fantasai (Copying to WHATWG mailing list: http://www.whatwg.org/ )
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 22:52:01 UTC