- From: Chris Holland <frenchy@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 13:12:03 -0800
you mean in the GET request URI? :) or POST with XML payload, like the eBay XML (non-REST) API. But yeah, it also comes down to use cases and how badly we actually would *need* cookie support. For any kind of heavily transactional application that requires some sort of state persistence, we're more likely to be hitting our own host. Keeping in mind that state can also be persisted without even resorting to cookies: get a token back in the xml response, snag it via the dom, and send it back in the next GET request. -c On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:35:53 -0600, Doron Rosenberg <doronr at gmail.com> wrote: > I think we can easily skip sending any cookies. Any sort of > authentiation should be included in the XML that is sent (see google > or amazon XML api) > -- Chris Holland http://chrisholland.blogspot.com/
Received on Sunday, 27 March 2005 13:12:03 UTC