- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 20:58:14 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Pete Cole wrote: > > I presume there is a line beyond which a 'kludge' becomes more than a > shim and a diversion from the spec. From the discussion here it seems > that there are some performance issues in implementation on IE. While > such issues can either be ignored (my document is so small it won't be > affected) or 'kludged' away (tr.repeat=...) is there any desirability in > considering spec changes that might solve the performance issues > altogether? Or is this all jumping the gun and one should wait for calls > for implementation? I think the problem is mostly that nobody has really come up with a good way of optimising it that makes sense for native implementations as well. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 24 March 2005 12:58:14 UTC