- From: Olav Junker Kjær <olav@olav.dk>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:13:10 +0100
Dean Edwards wrote: > It was my understanding (from reading previous threads) that there were > still some misgivings about the repetition model. There doesn't seem to be too much discussion about the repetition model. I think the reason some suggest dropping it from the spec, is that they would like a smaller spec (which is fair), and the repetition models is the easiest part to remove. I don't think it's because they have a problem with the model per se. I think the best thing for the repetition model would be to get some experience with implementing actual pages using it. This will probably give some valuable feedback to the spec. But we need to go to call for implementation before this will happen. Olav
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 11:13:10 UTC