- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:39:17 +0000 (UTC)
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, J. King wrote: > > Personally I'd elect for "url". Even though I prefer the term URI (and > really dislike the term IRI), "url" is what CSS uses, and there's a lot > to be said for consistency when authoring documents. On Mon, 21 Mar 2005, Mikko Rantalainen wrote: > > I think pretty much anybody that could use the feature has some idea what > "url" means. They don't know that "mailto:user at domain.com" isn't url but that > doesn't matter a little bit. Ok, would anyone object to us changing it to type="url"? I don't feel strongly about this. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 23 March 2005 04:39:17 UTC