W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > March 2005

[whatwg] [wf2] type="url"

From: J. King <mtknight@dark-phantasy.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 09:49:31 -0500
Message-ID: <op.snzsstxpk4suho@briann>
On Sun, 20 Mar 2005 20:28:41 -0500, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:

> On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>>
>> After thinking about it. Having |type="url"| instead of |type="uri"| or
>> |type="iri"| might not be so bad.
>
> type="url" will get me lynched by standards purists.
> type="iri" will get me lynched by confused authors.
> type="uri" is a compromise.

Personally I'd elect for "url".  Even though I prefer the term URI (and  
really dislike the term IRI), "url" is what CSS uses, and there's a lot to  
be said for consistency when authoring documents.


-- 
J. King
http://jking.dark-phantasy.com/
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 06:49:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:58:39 UTC