- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:11:38 -0400
Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, fantasai wrote: > >># url >># An IRI, as defined by [RFC3987] (the IRI token, defined in RFC 3987 >># section 2.2). UAs could, for example, offer the user URIs from his >># bookmarks. (See below for notes on IDN.) The value is called url (as >># opposed to iri or uri) for consistency with CSS syntax and because >># it is generally felt authors are more familiar with the term "URL" >># than the other, more technically correct terms. >> >>Does this allow relative urls? Please specify explicitly. > > It is specified very explicitly. Sorry, how about "stated very obviously"? "the IRI token" does not obviously exclude relative URLs unless one is in the habit of reading URL-related RFCs. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 09:11:38 UTC