- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 10:35:33 +0100
Karl, [I'm not on the WhatWG list, so this will probably bounce.] > I had a short look at the webforms and web applications > specification at whatwg.org, I didn't find anything about > modal and modeless windows. If there is anything to improve > for html, xhtml, xforms and compound documents, then, in my > opinion, the first missing feature that comes into my mind is > the lack of modal and modeless windows. XForms does already have modal and modeless messages, and I know that both X-Smiles and formsPlayer have implemented them in such a way that the message itself can contain other form controls. (I don't know about other implementations, but my guess is they probably do, too.) In other words, you can have a little sub-form that updates the main instance data, but appears to the user as a separate 'window'. The only difference then between modal messages and modeless ones are that modal messages block execution until they have been closed, whilst modeless ones can happily sit on top of the main form. Note also that once again we get a much better model in XForms, since actually what we are talking about is the behaviour of an abstract concept -- a 'message' -- which will act differently on different platforms. We don't say use some method call on the document or window object, as we have to do in current solutions, but which is very difficult to make accessible. Regards, Mark Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck at x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/
Received on Monday, 27 June 2005 02:35:33 UTC