- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:24:17 -0400
Jim Ley wrote:
> On 6/21/05, Matthew Raymond <mattraymond at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>Matthew Raymond wrote:
>> Now that I think about it, wouldn't the following be valid also?...
>>
>>| <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
>>| <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
>>| "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
>
>>| <X3D xmlns="http://www.web3d.org/specifications/x3d-3.0.xsd"
>
> Of course not, there is no X3D element in the above dtd.
Oh, I see. This was a suggestion in the XHTML 1.0 spec of how
namespaces MIGHT be used. [1] I guess it's out of date.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#well-formed
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2005 18:24:17 UTC