- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:58:53 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > Well, properties sheets in Windows have that kind of UI, for instance. But > > even if that was not the case, what is the use case for _not_ doing this? > > The use case is being able to style things based on whether the user can > edit them, no matter what the reason is for the user to not edit them. > Right now, for that use case you'd have to have to have > "selector:disabled, selector:read-only", which is rather > counter-intuitive. Sure, just like styling every link requires "selector:link, selector:visited". But that is better than preventing the alternative, in my opinion. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2005 17:58:53 UTC